Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

Washington

DataCentersExposed tracks 63 AI data centers in Washington — 12 operating and 5 in the pipeline — across 9 counties, drawing 2.7 GW of reported power demand from 17 tracked corporate operators. Washington's data-center tax break cost state and local governments $100.1M in forgone revenue in FY2024.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
63
data centers
Operating
12
live today
Pipeline
5
proposed / building
Demand
2.7 GW
16 w/ capacity
Counties
9
touched
Operators
17
corporate parents
The story so far

Washington at a glance

The largest footprint in Washington belongs to Sabey Data Centers, behind 12 tracked facilities. Microsoft Corporation, Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLC, and TierPoint, LLC round out the most active operators in the state. Many of these sites are filed under shell or project names rather than the parent's — our operator column resolves them back to the real corporate parent wherever the chain is documented.

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Grant County leads Washington with 15 facilities and a composite risk score of 39/100. Chelan County and King County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

Washington is not done growing. 5 facilities are in the pipeline — proposed, permitted, or under construction — which is where residents still have a say at zoning hearings and in rate cases. Each pending project is a decision about land, water, electricity prices, and tax revenue that hasn't been finalized.

We also surface the accountability trail: 3 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for Washington below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Data-center policy watch: Washington enacted SB 5982 (2026), tying large new data-center loads to the state's utility clean-energy deadlines.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 11 standardized 36 MW campuses in Washington by 2035 — roughly 396 MW of new electricity demand and ~35 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 64 campuses (2.3 GW). For scale, we currently track 63 real data centers in Washington (2.7 GW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth8
    288 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth11
    396 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth31
    1.1 GW · ~174 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth64
    2.3 GW · ~348 M gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~9% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Washington (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

Who's building

Top operators in Washington

What the tax break costs

The taxpayer price tag

via Washington State Department of Revenue
$100.1Min forgone state + local revenue, FY2024
Taxpayer savings ($ in millions): FY 2024 State Taxes $77.540, Local Taxes $22.590 ... Taxpayer Count: 22

Program-wide cost of Washington's data-center tax incentive(s), reported by the state — not attributable to a single facility. “Proj” = the state's own forward estimate; all other figures are realized/audited. Each links to its primary source.

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
Still contested

Pipeline & proposals

79 of 63 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
Google East WenatcheeAlphabet Inc.ProposedDouglas480
Atlas AgroProposedBenton
Spokane Data CenterProposedSpokane
Microsoft MalagaMicrosoft Data Center LLCUnder constructionChelan County360
KEEL Moses LakeKEELUnder constructionGrant County18
Microsoft QuincyMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Grant600
AWS QuincyAmazon.com, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Grant540
Vantage QuincyVantage Data Centers Holdings, LLCOperatingGrant County89
Intergate Quincy Data CenterSabey Data CentersOperatingGrant85
Yahoo Data CenterPrime Data CentersOperatingGrant82
H5 Data CenterPrime Data CentersOperatingGrant40
Intergate Seattle West Building CSabey Data CentersOperatingKing28
Bitfarm Bitcoin WashingtonOperatingGrant18
Westin BuildingDigital Realty Trust, Inc.OperatingKing13
Equinix SE3 Data CenterEquinix, Inc.OperatingKing7
EdgeConneX Seattle (EDCSEA01)Mapped (unverified)4.5
ActapioMapped (unverified)Douglas
CSSNW BellinghamOperatingWhatcom
CTI BiopharmaMapped (unverified)King
CenterisCenterisMapped (unverified)Pierce
Centeris SH1 ColocationCenterisMapped (unverified)Pierce
Centeris SH2 Build-to-SuitCenterisMapped (unverified)Pierce
Centersquare Lynnwood SE1CenterSquare (formerly Cyxtera)Mapped (unverified)Snohomish
Cogent SeattleCogent CommunicationsMapped (unverified)
ColoCrossing SEA1Mapped (unverified)
Colocation Northwest - BellevueMapped (unverified)
Colocation Northwest - RedmondMapped (unverified)
Colocation Northwest - SeattleMapped (unverified)
Colocation Northwest - South HillMapped (unverified)
Colocation Northwest - TacomaMapped (unverified)
CyrusOne QuincyCyrusOne LLCMapped (unverified)Grant
DataBank Seattle (SEA1)Mapped (unverified)
Digital Fortress (SEA)Mapped (unverified)
Digital Fortress (TUK)Mapped (unverified)
Digital Fortress LynnwoodOperatingSnohomish
Eat12Mapped (unverified)Chelan
Eat13Mapped (unverified)Chelan
Eat14Mapped (unverified)Chelan
Equinix SE4 - Seattle, KentEquinix, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
Evocative SEA1Mapped (unverified)
Intergate ColumbiaSabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)Douglas
Intergate Columbia ASabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)Douglas
Intergate Columbia BSabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)Douglas
Intergate Columbia DSabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)Douglas
Intergate Seattle East Building 1Sabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)King
Intergate Seattle East Building 2Sabey Data CentersOperatingKing
Intergate Seattle East Building 3Sabey Data CentersOperatingKing
Intergate Seattle East Building 4Digital Realty Trust, Inc.Mapped (unverified)King
Intergate Seattle East Building 5Sabey Data CentersOperatingKing
Intergate Seattle West Building ASabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)King
Intergate Seattle West Building BSabey Data CentersMapped (unverified)King
Iron MountainIron Mountain IncorporatedMapped (unverified)Spokane
KOMO Plaza EastOperatingKing
KOMO Plaza WestMapped (unverified)King
Kanobe, LLCMapped (unverified)
Lunavi - Westin1809Mapped (unverified)
Lunavi - Westin1969Mapped (unverified)
Lunavi - Westin3205Mapped (unverified)
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Grant
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Grant
Microsoft EAT02Microsoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Douglas
Microsoft EAT03Microsoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Douglas
Microsoft EAT04Microsoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Douglas
NTT Data QuincyNTT Global Data CentersMapped (unverified)Grant
Neutron - SpokaneMapped (unverified)
Norma Beach Cable Landing StationMapped (unverified)Snohomish
Optic Fusion - Perkins BuildingMapped (unverified)
SbtcMapped (unverified)
Serverfarm TiTAN Moses LakeServerfarmMapped (unverified)
The Seattle TimesH5 Data CentersOperatingKing
TierPointTierPoint, LLCMapped (unverified)Spokane
TierPoint SeattleTierPoint, LLCMapped (unverified)
TierPoint SpokaneTierPoint, LLCMapped (unverified)
US Bank BuildingMapped (unverified)
Vantage WA11Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLCMapped (unverified)Grant
Vantage WA12Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLCMapped (unverified)Grant
Vantage WA13Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLCMapped (unverified)Grant
WowRackMapped (unverified)
Wowrack Datacenter - TukwilaMapped (unverified)

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.