Franklin County, Ohio
DataCentersExposed tracks 14 AI data centers in Franklin County, Ohio — 1 operating and 0 in the pipeline, drawing 2.4 GW of reported power demand, led by Amazon.com, Inc.. Its transparent data-center risk score is 1/100.
Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard
Reporting by Eric Keller · Updated May 29, 2026
- Project exposure · 40
- Power demand · 72
- Water draw · n/a
- Land footprint · n/a
What's happening in Franklin County
Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 2.4 GW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.
Amazon.com, Inc. has the largest presence in Franklin County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.
Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.
2035 Buildout Outlook
Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 1 standardized 36 MW campus in Franklin County by 2035 — roughly 36 MW of new electricity demand and ~35 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 9 campuses (324 MW). For scale, we currently track 14 real data centers in Franklin County (2.4 GW of reported power).
- Low growth136 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
- Moderate growth136 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
- High growth4144 MW · ~139 M gal/yr cooling water
- Higher growth9324 MW · ~313 M gal/yr cooling water
The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Franklin County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.
These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.
Every tracked facility
| Facility | Operator | Status | MW |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWS New Albany Campus 2 | Amazon.com, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | 800 |
| AWS New Albany Campus 1 New Albany | Amazon.com, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | 600 |
| Google New Albany | Alphabet Inc. | 480 | |
| Meta New Albany | Meta Platforms, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | 420 |
| Amazon Web Services | Amazon.com, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | 73 |
| Amazon Web Services | Amazon.com, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Amazon Web Services | Amazon.com, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Amazon Web Services | Amazon.com, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Compugen New Albany | — | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Google Lockbourne, OH | Alphabet Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Google NBY-4 | Alphabet Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Oppidan | — | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| STACK New Albany | Stack Infrastructure, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| TJX Companies Data Center (New Albany, OH) | — | Mapped (unverified) | — |
County commissioners
How the Franklin County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.