Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

Tennessee

DataCentersExposed tracks 36 AI data centers in Tennessee — 5 operating and 6 in the pipeline — across 10 counties, drawing 1.2 GW of reported power demand from 11 tracked corporate operators.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
36
data centers
Operating
5
live today
Pipeline
6
proposed / building
Demand
1.2 GW
9 w/ capacity
Counties
10
touched
Operators
11
corporate parents
The story so far

Tennessee at a glance

The largest footprint in Tennessee belongs to Flexential Corp., behind 4 tracked facilities. Alphabet Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Lumen Technologies round out the most active operators in the state. Many of these sites are filed under shell or project names rather than the parent's — our operator column resolves them back to the real corporate parent wherever the chain is documented.

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Williamson County leads Tennessee with 5 facilities and a composite risk score of 9/100. Montgomery County and Davidson County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

Tennessee is not done growing. 6 facilities are in the pipeline — proposed, permitted, or under construction — which is where residents still have a say at zoning hearings and in rate cases. Each pending project is a decision about land, water, electricity prices, and tax revenue that hasn't been finalized.

We also surface the accountability trail: 8 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for Tennessee below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 3 standardized 36 MW campuses in Tennessee by 2035 — roughly 108 MW of new electricity demand and ~104 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 16 campuses (576 MW). For scale, we currently track 36 real data centers in Tennessee (1.2 GW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth2
    72 MW · ~70 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth3
    108 MW · ~104 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth8
    288 MW · ~279 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth16
    576 MW · ~557 M gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Tennessee (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

Who's building

Top operators in Tennessee

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
Still contested

Pipeline & proposals

43 of 36 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
DC BLOX Nashville (Grassmere Park)DC BLOXProposedDavidson50
Quantum Leap Data Center/ Fisk University—ProposedDavidson30
Arnold Air Force Base Data Center—ProposedCoffee—
DC Blox Data Center—ProposedDavidson—
Fisk University Data Center—ProposedDavidson—
Jailhouse Studios Data Center—Under constructionHamilton—
Colossus 2—Mapped (unverified)Shelby661
xAI Colossus (South Memphis)xAI Corp.OperatingShelby422
Flexential Nashville - FranklinFlexential Corp.OperatingWilliamson6
TierPointTierPoint, LLCOperatingWilliamson2.4
Expedient MemphisExpedient, LLCMapped (unverified)—1.5
Bnym—Mapped (unverified)Davidson—
DC Blox ChattanoogaDC BLOXOperatingHamilton—
DataBank Memphis (MEM1)—Mapped (unverified)——
EdgeConneX Memphis (EDCMEM01)—Mapped (unverified)——
EdgeConneX Nashville (EDCNAS01)—Mapped (unverified)——
Flexential Brentwood Data CenterFlexential Corp.Mapped (unverified)Williamson—
Flexential Nashville - BrentwoodFlexential Corp.OperatingWilliamson—
Flexential Nashville - Cool SpringsFlexential Corp.OperatingWilliamson—
Frontier (supercomputer)—Mapped (unverified)Roane—
Gallatin Data CenterPrime Data CentersMapped (unverified)Sumner—
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Montgomery—
Google Montgomery Data CenterAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Montgomery—
H5 Data Centers NashvilleH5 Data CentersMapped (unverified)——
HCA Information Technology & Services Data Center—Mapped (unverified)Davidson—
Level(3) MemphisLumen TechnologiesMapped (unverified)——
Level(3) Nashville (9th Ave)Lumen TechnologiesMapped (unverified)——
Level(3) Nashville (Sidco Drive)Lumen TechnologiesMapped (unverified)——
Meta Gallatin Data CenterMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sumner—
Meta Gallatin Data CenterMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sumner—
Meta Gallatin Data CenterMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sumner—
Newrays Two LLC Mining—Mapped (unverified)Henry—
Peace Communications KNX1—Mapped (unverified)——
Peace Communications CHA1—Mapped (unverified)——
Peace Communications NSH2—Mapped (unverified)——
Spc3aAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Montgomery—
Spc4aAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Montgomery—
Tennessee Processing Center LLC—Mapped (unverified)Davidson—
Tennessee South Data Center—Mapped (unverified)Rutherford—
Verizon WirelessVerizon Communications Inc.Mapped (unverified)Davidson—
XO Nashville—Mapped (unverified)——
Zayo Nashville - 209 10th Ave. S—Mapped (unverified)——
xAI Colossus 2 (building)xAI Corp.Mapped (unverified)Shelby—

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.