Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Licking County, Ohio

DataCentersExposed tracks 15 AI data centers in Licking County, Ohio — 0 operating and 7 in the pipeline, drawing 3.4 GW of reported power demand, led by Amazon.com, Inc.. Its transparent data-center risk score is 1/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Facilities
15
Operating
0
Pipeline
7

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
53High
  • Project exposure · 42
  • Power demand · 67
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Licking County

Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 3.4 GW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.

Amazon.com, Inc. has the largest presence in Licking County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 5 standardized 36 MW campuses in Licking County by 2035 — roughly 180 MW of new electricity demand and ~174 M gal/yr of cooling water. For scale, we currently track 15 real data centers in Licking County (3.4 GW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Higher growth5
    180 MW · ~174 M gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Licking County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

15 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Karis Critical Data Center
Johnstown
Proposed36
Johnstown Data Center (Beech Rd.)
Johnstown
Proposed
Microsoft Licking County (Heath/Hebron/New Albany)
New Albany
Microsoft Data Center LLCProposed
AWS New Albany Campus 3 (expansion)Amazon.com, Inc.Under construction1,100
EdgeConneX New Albany Data Center
Johnstown
EdgeConneX, Inc.Under construction120
CyrusOne COL-1
Johnstown
Under construction
Microsoft Licking County Campus 1Microsoft CorporationPermitted900
MetaMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)691
Google NBY-3Alphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)543
Amazon Web ServicesAmazon.com, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
Amazon Web Services CMH53Amazon.com, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
MetaMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
QTS Nal 2 Dc2
New Albany
QTS Realty Trust, LLCMapped (unverified)
QTS Nal1 Dc1
New Albany
QTS Realty Trust, LLCMapped (unverified)
Vantage Building 3
New Albany
Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLCMapped (unverified)
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Licking County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.