Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Laramie County, Wyoming

DataCentersExposed tracks 11 AI data centers in Laramie County, Wyoming — 0 operating and 4 in the pipeline, drawing 12.1 GW of reported power demand, led by Compass Datacenters, LLC. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Facilities
11
Operating
0
Pipeline
4

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
11Low
  • Project exposure · 19
  • Power demand · 0
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Laramie County

Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 12.1 GW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.

Compass Datacenters, LLC has the largest presence in Laramie County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 2 standardized 36 MW campuses in Laramie County by 2035 — roughly 72 MW of new electricity demand and ~0 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 4 campuses (144 MW). For scale, we currently track 11 real data centers in Laramie County (12.1 GW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth1
    36 MW · ~0 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth2
    72 MW · ~0 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth2
    72 MW · ~0 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth4
    144 MW · ~0 M gal/yr cooling water

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

11 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Project Jade Data Center Campus (Cheyenne)
Cheyenne
Proposed1,800
Related Digital Cheyenne Data Center
Cheyenne
Related Digital/CoreWeaveProposed250
Meta Data Center
Cheyenne
Meta Platforms, Inc.Proposed
Microsoft Cheyenne Expansion
Cheyenne
Microsoft Data Center LLCProposed
Project Jade
Cheyenne
CrusoeBlocked10,000
CYS41 DatacenterCompass Datacenters, LLCMapped (unverified)
CYS42 DatacenterCompass Datacenters, LLCMapped (unverified)
Microsoft CYS DatacenterMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)
MineOne Wyoming Data CenterMapped (unverified)
NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center
Cheyenne
Mapped (unverified)
Windbreak Cable
Pine Bluffs
Mapped (unverified)
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Laramie County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.