Travis County, Texas
DataCentersExposed tracks 16 AI data centers in Travis County, Texas — 9 operating and 1 in the pipeline, drawing 260 MW of reported power demand, led by CyrusOne LLC. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.
Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard
Reporting by Eric Keller · Updated May 29, 2026
- Project exposure · 28
- Power demand · 22
- Water draw · n/a
- Land footprint · n/a
What's happening in Travis County
Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 260 MW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.
CyrusOne LLC has the largest presence in Travis County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.
Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.
2035 Buildout Outlook
Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 2 standardized 36 MW campuses in Travis County by 2035 — roughly 72 MW of new electricity demand and ~70 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 18 campuses (648 MW). For scale, we currently track 16 real data centers in Travis County (260 MW of reported power).
- Low growth136 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
- Moderate growth272 MW · ~70 M gal/yr cooling water
- High growth6216 MW · ~209 M gal/yr cooling water
- Higher growth18648 MW · ~627 M gal/yr cooling water
The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Travis County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.
These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.
Every tracked facility
| Facility | Operator | Status | MW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skybox - Austin 2 Pflugerville | — | Under construction | — |
| Digital Realty Austin Campus Austin | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | 220 |
| CyrusOne Austin Data Center III | CyrusOne LLC | 24 | |
| Digital Realty Austin AUS11 Austin | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 16 | |
| Alpheus DataCenter Austin | — | — | |
| Cortex supercomputer | — | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Data Foundry - Texas 1 Austin | — | — | |
| Data Foundry - Texas 2 Austin | — | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Data Foundry Austin 1 Data Center | — | — | |
| Element Critical | Element Critical | — | |
| LightEdge Austin I | — | — | |
| LightEdge Austin II Austin | — | — | |
| Lumen Austin 1 | Lumen Technologies, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Lumen Austin 3 | Lumen Technologies, Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
| Oracle-Austin Data Center Austin | Oracle Corporation | — | |
| Thin-nology Pflugerville | — | Mapped (unverified) | — |
County commissioners
How the Travis County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.