Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Douglas County, Georgia

DataCentersExposed tracks 18 AI data centers in Douglas County, Georgia — 5 operating and 8 in the pipeline, drawing 2.6 GW of reported power demand, led by Alphabet Inc.. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Facilities
18
Operating
5
Pipeline
8

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
34Moderate
  • Project exposure · 22
  • Power demand · 50
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Douglas County

Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 2.6 GW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.

Alphabet Inc. has the largest presence in Douglas County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 1 standardized 36 MW campus in Douglas County by 2035 — roughly 36 MW of new electricity demand and ~35 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 8 campuses (288 MW). For scale, we currently track 18 real data centers in Douglas County (2.6 GW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Moderate growth1
    36 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth3
    108 MW · ~104 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth8
    288 MW · ~279 M gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Douglas County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

18 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Stream Data Center
Winston
Proposed240
AWS Douglas County (Douglasville)
Douglasville
Amazon Data Services, Inc.Proposed
Hickman Property
Villa Rica
East Village Donthan LLCProposed
Rock House Road Data Center
Lithia Springs
Amazon.com, Inc.Proposed
Vantage Data Center
Douglasville
Proposed
Microsoft East Point — Douglas CountyMicrosoft CorporationUnder construction750
STACK Atlanta ATL02
Lithia Springs
Stack Infrastructure, Inc.Under construction160
Microsoft East US 3 — Douglasville
Douglasville
Microsoft Data Center LLCUnder construction
Google Douglas CountyAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)360
T5 @ Atlanta III
Lithia Springs
T5Operating300
Stream Atlanta West Data Center
Winston
Stream Data CentersOperating240
Flexential Corporation
DOUGLASVILLE
Mapped (unverified)150
Switch Data Center
Lithia Springs
Prime Data CentersMapped (unverified)150
Flexential Atlanta - Douglasville 1
Douglasville
Flexential Corp.Operating120
Google Datacenter - Douglas CountyAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)78
Centersquare Atlanta ATL1
Lithia Springs
CenterSquare (formerly Cyxtera)Operating7
Digital Realty Atlanta ATL11
Austell
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
PWC Lithia Springs
Lithia Springs
PricewaterhouseCoopersOperating
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Douglas County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.