Fairfield County, Ohio
DataCentersExposed tracks 3 AI data centers in Fairfield County, Ohio — 0 operating and 1 in the pipeline, drawing 964 MW of reported power demand, led by Alphabet Inc.. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.
Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard
Reporting by Eric Keller · Updated May 29, 2026
- Project exposure · 10
- Power demand · 0
- Water draw · n/a
- Land footprint · n/a
What's happening in Fairfield County
Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 964 MW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.
Alphabet Inc. has the largest presence in Fairfield County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.
Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.
2035 Buildout Outlook
Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 4 standardized 36 MW campuses in Fairfield County by 2035 — roughly 144 MW of new electricity demand and ~139 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 15 campuses (540 MW). For scale, we currently track 3 real data centers in Fairfield County (964 MW of reported power).
- Low growth272 MW · ~70 M gal/yr cooling water
- Moderate growth4144 MW · ~139 M gal/yr cooling water
- High growth10360 MW · ~348 M gal/yr cooling water
- Higher growth15540 MW · ~522 M gal/yr cooling water
The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Fairfield County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.
These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.
Every tracked facility
| Facility | Operator | Status | MW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vantage Data Center Millersport | Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLC | Proposed | 800 |
| Google Lancaster LANCASTER | Google LLC | Mapped (unverified) | 164 |
| Alphabet Inc. | Mapped (unverified) | — |
County commissioners
How the Fairfield County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.