Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Storey County, Nevada

DataCentersExposed tracks 7 AI data centers in Storey County, Nevada — 0 operating and 6 in the pipeline, drawing 3.7 GW of reported power demand, led by Tract. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Facilities
7
Operating
0
Pipeline
6

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
4Low
  • Project exposure · 7
  • Power demand · 0
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Storey County

Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 3.7 GW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.

Tract has the largest presence in Storey County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

7 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
South Valley Technology Park Data Center
Sparks
TractProposed1,200
Tract Data Center
Sparks
Proposed810
NV11–NV14 Data Center Campus
Sparks
Proposed224
Tract Data Center
Silver Springs
FleetUnder construction1,200
Vantage NV1 Reno
Reno
Vantage Data Centers Holdings, LLCUnder construction224
Novva Tahoe Reno
Reno
Novva Data CentersUnder construction60
Switch Tahoe Reno - The Citadel Campus
McCarran
Switch, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Storey County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.