Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

Nebraska

DataCentersExposed tracks 25 AI data centers in Nebraska — 1 operating and 3 in the pipeline — across 4 counties, drawing 1.4 GW of reported power demand from 5 tracked corporate operators. Nebraska's data-center tax break is projected to cost the state $5.7M in forgone revenue in FY2025.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
25
data centers
Operating
1
live today
Pipeline
3
proposed / building
Demand
1.4 GW
7 w/ capacity
Counties
4
touched
Operators
5
corporate parents
The story so far

Nebraska at a glance

The largest footprint in Nebraska belongs to Alphabet Inc., behind 8 tracked facilities. Meta Platforms, Inc., TierPoint, LLC, and Lumen Technologies round out the most active operators in the state. Many of these sites are filed under shell or project names rather than the parent's — our operator column resolves them back to the real corporate parent wherever the chain is documented.

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Sarpy County leads Nebraska with 15 facilities and a composite risk score of 37/100. Douglas County and Buffalo County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

Nebraska is not done growing. 3 facilities are in the pipeline — proposed, permitted, or under construction — which is where residents still have a say at zoning hearings and in rate cases. Each pending project is a decision about land, water, electricity prices, and tax revenue that hasn't been finalized.

We also surface the accountability trail: 4 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for Nebraska below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 8 standardized 36 MW campuses in Nebraska by 2035 — roughly 288 MW of new electricity demand and ~279 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 49 campuses (1.8 GW). For scale, we currently track 25 real data centers in Nebraska (1.4 GW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth6
    216 MW · ~209 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth8
    288 MW · ~279 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth24
    864 MW · ~836 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth49
    1.8 GW · ~1.7 billion gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Nebraska (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

Who's building

Top operators in Nebraska

What the tax break costs

The taxpayer price tag

via Nebraska Department of Revenue
$5.7Min forgone state revenue, FY2025 (state projection)
5. Data Centers Statutory citation: 77-2704.62 ... Estimate: $5,667,000 Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Economic Census

Program-wide cost of Nebraska's data-center tax incentive(s), reported by the state — not attributable to a single facility. “Proj” = the state's own forward estimate; all other figures are realized/audited. Each links to its primary source.

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
CountyFacilitiesPipelineRisk
Sarpy County15137
Douglas County712
Buffalo County214
Lancaster County11
Still contested

Pipeline & proposals

32 of 25 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
Google PapillionAlphabet Inc.Under constructionSarpy600
Google Lincoln Data CenterAlphabet Inc.Under constructionLancaster
Sequitor Edge KearneySequitor EdgeUnder constructionBuffalo County
Meta PapillionMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy480
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Douglas198
YahooMapped (unverified)Sarpy17
1623 FarnamOperatingDouglas
Binary Net VaultMapped (unverified)
Compute NorthMapped (unverified)Buffalo
Fireball Group LLC Data CenterMapped (unverified)Sarpy
FidelityMapped (unverified)Sarpy
First National Technical CenterMapped (unverified)Douglas
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Douglas
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Douglas
Level(3) BellevueLumen TechnologiesMapped (unverified)
LightEdge Omaha (OMA1)Mapped (unverified)
Lincoln Data CentersMapped (unverified)
Meta Sarpy Data centerMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
Meta Sarpy Data centerMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
Meta Sarpy Data centerMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
Meta Sarpy Data centerMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
Meta Sarpy Data centerMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Sarpy
Raven Northbrook LLCMapped (unverified)Sarpy
Scott Data Center OmahaMapped (unverified)
TierPoint Omaha - BellevueTierPoint, LLCMapped (unverified)
TierPoint Omaha - MidlandsTierPoint, LLCMapped (unverified)
Travelers InsuranceMapped (unverified)Sarpy
Union Pacific Jack Koraleski Technology, Research & Development CenterMapped (unverified)Douglas
Verizon WirelessVerizon Communications Inc.Mapped (unverified)Douglas

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.