Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Los Angeles County, California

DataCentersExposed tracks 7 AI data centers in Los Angeles County, California — 5 operating and 0 in the pipeline, led by American Tower Corporation. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Los Angeles County, California has 7 tracked data centers, 5 of them operating. Its composite data-center risk score is 13 out of 100 — see the breakdown above for which factors drive it.

Facilities
7
Operating
5
Pipeline
0

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
13Low
  • Project exposure · 23
  • Power demand · 0
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Los Angeles County

American Tower Corporation has the largest presence in Los Angeles County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

7 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
CoreSite - LA2
Los Angeles
American Tower CorporationOperating
Drt Lax10Mapped (unverified)
Drt Lax12
El Segundo
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.Operating
Equinix
Torrance
Equinix, Inc.Operating
One Wilshire
Los Angeles
CoreSite, LLCOperating
Serverfarm - LAX1
El Segundo
Operating
USPO Terminal Annex
Los Angeles
Mapped (unverified)
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Los Angeles County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.