Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Rockingham County, Virginia

DataCentersExposed tracks 0 AI data centers in Rockingham County, Virginia — 0 operating and 0 in the pipeline.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Rockingham County, Virginia has 0 tracked data centers.

Facilities
0
Operating
0
Pipeline
0

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Overview

What's happening in Rockingham County

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 5 standardized 36 MW campuses in Rockingham County by 2035 — roughly 180 MW of new electricity demand and ~174 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 63 campuses (2.3 GW).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth2
    72 MW · ~70 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth5
    180 MW · ~174 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth25
    900 MW · ~870 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth63
    2.3 GW · ~2.2 billion gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Rockingham County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

0 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Rockingham County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.