Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Spartanburg County, South Carolina

DataCentersExposed tracks 1 AI data center in Spartanburg County, South Carolina — 0 operating and 0 in the pipeline, drawing 100 MW of reported power demand.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Facilities
1
Operating
0
Pipeline
0

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Overview

What's happening in Spartanburg County

Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 100 MW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 2 standardized 36 MW campuses in Spartanburg County by 2035 — roughly 72 MW of new electricity demand and ~70 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 9 campuses (324 MW). For scale, we currently track 1 real data center in Spartanburg County (100 MW of reported power).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • High growth2
    72 MW · ~70 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth9
    324 MW · ~313 M gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Spartanburg County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

1 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Project Spero
Moore
TigerDCWithdrawn100
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Spartanburg County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.