Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Franklin County, Pennsylvania

DataCentersExposed tracks 0 AI data centers in Franklin County, Pennsylvania — 0 operating and 0 in the pipeline.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Franklin County, Pennsylvania has 0 tracked data centers.

Facilities
0
Operating
0
Pipeline
0

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Overview

What's happening in Franklin County

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 10 standardized 36 MW campuses in Franklin County by 2035 — roughly 360 MW of new electricity demand and ~348 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 54 campuses (1.9 GW).

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth7
    252 MW · ~244 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth10
    360 MW · ~348 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth27
    972 MW · ~940 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth54
    1.9 GW · ~1.9 billion gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Franklin County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

0 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Franklin County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.