Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Middlesex County, Massachusetts

DataCentersExposed tracks 3 AI data centers in Middlesex County, Massachusetts — 2 operating and 1 in the pipeline, led by American Tower Corporation. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Facilities
3
Operating
2
Pipeline
1

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
6Low
  • Project exposure · 10
  • Power demand · 0
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Middlesex County

American Tower Corporation has the largest presence in Middlesex County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

Modeled scenario · not announced

2035 Buildout Outlook

via PNNL IM3 (CC BY 4.0)

Under the model's moderate-growth scenario (5%/yr annual load growth), PNNL's IM3 model sites about 2 standardized 36 MW campuses in Middlesex County by 2035 — roughly 72 MW of new electricity demand and ~70 M gal/yr of cooling water. Under the higher-growth scenario (15%/yr) that climbs to 8 campuses (288 MW). For scale, we currently track 3 real data centers in Middlesex County.

Modeled new campuses by demand-growth scenario
  • Low growth1
    36 MW · ~35 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Moderate growth2
    72 MW · ~70 M gal/yr cooling water
  • High growth5
    180 MW · ~174 M gal/yr cooling water
  • Higher growth8
    288 MW · ~279 M gal/yr cooling water

The model assigns ~100% of these campuses' cooling to evaporative water cooling in Middlesex County (the rest to mechanical/air cooling), a split it derives from local water stress and wet-bulb temperature.

These are modeled candidate sites, not announced or permitted facilities. PNNL's IM3 model places identical 36 MW unit-campuses at feasible locations under each scenario — it shows where demand could concentrate, never a specific parcel. Figures use a market-gravity weight of 50. How the model works.

3 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Everett Data Center
Everett
Proposed
CoreSite BO1
Somerville
American Tower CorporationOperating
Markley Data CenterOperating
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Middlesex County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.