Stop / shape: Ridgeline Microgrid

Campaign · Decision pending

Ridgeline Microgrid

Tucker, West Virginia

supporters

Ridgeline Microgrid in Davis, WV is contested. Organized Advocacy | Petition: https://www.change.org/p/protect-local-freedom-urge-governor-morrisey-to-veto-data-center-bill, https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fundamental-data-llcs-air-permit-application-r13-3713/ | Group: https://www.tuckerunited.com/ | Group: https://friendsofblackwater.org/ | Petition targets WV microgrid bill enabling Ridgeline project. Project has generated significant organized opposition from local residents and environmental groups concerned about air pollution, tourism impacts, and microgrid legislation enabling the development. Track what's being decided, when, and how to weigh in.

Your action kit

Sourced arguments and ready-to-send letters — every figure links to a primary record. Edit to add your own story.

Power & your bill

1,656 MW of new demand — roughly a city of 1,325,000 homes.

Large new loads can raise transmission and capacity costs that land on every ratepayer. Residential power in WV is 16.8¢/kWh, up 3.8% year-over-year. (MW→homes is a rough ~800/MW planning figure.)

Source

Process

Demand a full, public review — not a rubber stamp.

Ask for an independent noise study, a water-and-power impact assessment, enforceable conditions (setbacks, hours, cooling type), and that the record stays open for written comment. Procedural shortcuts have voided approvals elsewhere.

Public comment (editable)

Edit freely before sending — it's a starting point. Add your own story; personal comments carry the most weight.

Records / FOIA request

Public Records Request

To the records custodian for Tucker County, WV,

Under the applicable public-records law, I request copies of the following records concerning the data-center project known as "Ridgeline Microgrid":

1. The complete application, including any rezoning, special-use/conditional-use permit, or site-plan submissions and all exhibits.
2. All staff reports, analyses, and recommendations.
3. Any traffic, noise, water-use, stormwater, or utility/load studies submitted or commissioned.
4. Any development agreement, proffers, or tax-incentive/abatement agreements and their term sheets.
5. All correspondence between the applicant (or its agents) and county/city staff or elected officials regarding this project.
6. Notices of public hearings and proof of required public notice.

I request these in electronic form where available. If any portion is withheld, please cite the specific exemption. If fees will exceed $25, please contact me first.

Thank you,
[Your name]
[Your email / address]

Edit freely before sending — it's a starting point. Add your own story; personal comments carry the most weight.

Join the campaign

Add your name and we'll email you before every hearing, with what to say and where to show up.

Neighbors taking a stand

Be the first to say why this matters. Public notes appear here to show officials the strength of local feeling.

See the full facility record →Organizing toolkit & model ordinances →All campaigns →

Hearing data is gathered automatically from public meeting agendas (Legistar / Granicus and other civic platforms) and reader tips, each tagged with its source and confidence. Figures link to primary records. Found an error or a missing hearing? Tell us.